Author Topic: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood  (Read 682 times)

Toedancer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13756
    • View Profile
50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« on: November 15, 2009, 01:41:38 PM »
We're all aware of Truman Capote's book In Cold Blood and the movie with Hoffman as Capote. The cousin (Diana Edwards) of the 2 Clutter teens bound, gagged and murdered (along with their parents), has written an essay of her thoughts and grief. Diana Selsor Edwards is a cultural anthropologist and a mental health counselor (LPCC). She recently gave workshops in Santa Fe on adoption issues, and grief and loss. I certainly have no cred in writing styles, but I found her candor, openness just so clean and earthy.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/story/1566961.html
"Democracy is not the law of the majority, it's the protection of the minority." -Albert Camus 1913-1960

deBeauxOs

  • Guest
Re: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2009, 02:24:37 PM »
Your evaluation is correct.  That was beautifully written.

skdadl

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32874
    • View Profile
    • http://www.pogge.ca
Re: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2009, 02:41:02 PM »
It is very moving to read, Toe -- I agree. In fact, I think that many people would have welcomed it before now, and I kind of think she has more to say. There's a big gap right at the end, understandably, because this appears to be her first attempt to speak about something that was a major trauma in her life and was then complicated by someone else's celebrity and a different narrative of the same trauma.

Although I can understand how she felt when she first read Capote (and then has had to cope with more Capote since), I don't believe that testifying -- which is what good writing always is, fiction or non-fiction -- is ever a zero-sum game. Maybe she will always be angry at Capote for telling the story he did, and she obviously needs to get that out. Fair enough. And maybe, because she was so close, she will never get past that anger. Also understandable enough. But the truth is that she has her own story and she can write it, so she should.

I don't believe that Capote did anything wrong in producing that great book, although of course he could never do justice to the Clutters because he never knew them. She did and she can, so she should. In a way, the one has nothing to do with the other, although if she could write out as well the emotional struggle she's gone through living with Capote's narrative as a second trauma, that would be a great story too.

Capote knew the killers and he was fascinated by them, one of them especially. He wasn't alone, and that's not strange either. Those killings were so brutal, so apparently inexplicable, that people couldn't help trying to understand. How could that happen to such people, and why? Who would do that? Obvious questions, and those were the questions Capote pursued.

I don't think it's entirely true to say that Capote made the Clutters cardboard figures, either. It's been a long time since I read the book, but Capote narrated the murders in excruciating detail -- derived from exhaustive interviewing locally and interviews with the killers -- and some of that detail is still in my mind. I remember especially how father and son died in the basement, and I remember the tenderness with which both Capote and her killer (obviously) spoke of Nancy -- just before her killer blew her away. I'm sure that was beyond unbearable for Diana to read, but I will never forget Nancy.

Toedancer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13756
    • View Profile
Re: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2009, 03:24:08 PM »
It was this paragraph that slayed me - In Nancy’s room, my mother looks through her closet and her drawers.  I don’t think we should be doing this. Nancy would not want my mother and the aunts looking through her things. I sit in a chair against the wall and grip the bottom sides of the seat.  I know we should not be here.  At any moment I am afraid that I will go mad and start screaming. In front of me, stuck to the wall above Nancy’s bed is a fragment of flesh and dried blood, overlooked by whomever did the first cleaning, and now overlooked by my mother.

The instincts of a very young woman ignored by the grown-ups. She didn't voice it, and she didn't just think it, she felt it. She sensed something very wrong. Those senses and instincts are about right and wrong, sometimes you meet adults who still retain them, like really good cops and really good doctors, and sometimes you see adults who have lost that utterly clear quickening in times of emotional overload. I just thought what a noble young woman, the vulnerability of her writing tells us her senses are still heightened and I so admire that.
"Democracy is not the law of the majority, it's the protection of the minority." -Albert Camus 1913-1960

deBeauxOs

  • Guest
Re: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2009, 07:33:38 PM »
Her choices, in her studies and in the work she does, seem coherent with those qualities you describe, Toe.

Bread & Roses Forum

Re: 50 years ago/In Cold Blood
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2009, 07:33:38 PM »

 

Return To TAT