Author Topic: The Socially Conservative Male  (Read 1935 times)

Debra

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11228
    • View Profile
    • April Reign
The Socially Conservative Male
« on: October 04, 2006, 01:24:53 PM »
Wasn't sure where to put this anyway..

It is long but well worth the read. I thought this point particularly good

Quote
The same cannot be said for conservative males. They are ravening sex fiends on a hair-trigger, doomed to act out their polluted fantasies because thought and deed are the same to them.


http://www.counterpunch.org/tripp09302006.html
“Damaged people are dangerous. They know they can survive.” —  Josephine Hart

Toedancer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13966
    • View Profile
The Socially Conservative Male
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2006, 09:36:52 PM »
Republicans Repressed Thoughts Gone Wild.
Power and elitism seems to be the calling card for 'the list' (the list in Debra's link and the list below), as well as the get out of jail for free card. And they are running the show. 2,000 girls/women-boys/men are missing in Iraq already.

This article deals with a pedophile in Homeland Security.

Quote
t's about a victimized boy named Justin Berry, and a Bush official in Homeland Security who is a pedophile. It's about the Justice Department doing nothing with a list of 1,500 names that Justin handed them. It's about a Homeland Security department so inept they didn't even know they had a pedophile in their midst.

Quote
Today, Justin Berry told a story of how he had given Bush's Justice Department the names of over 1,500 people who he'd had sexual experiences with over the time he ran his web porn site. To this day, the Bush Justice Department has done NOTHING.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=2178

Quote
llinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has written Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in response to the recent revelation that the Pentagon has not acted on presidential and congressional orders to stop doing business with companies that traffick in humans, The Chicago Tribune reports.

The Tribune reported last week that lobbyists for Halliburton's KBR and other companies objected to language in the orders that required them to monitor sub-contractors for use of forced labor or prostitution.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Governor_ ... _1230.html

Quote
A proposal prohibiting defense contractor involvement in human trafficking for forced prostitution and labor was drafted by the Pentagon last summer, but five defense lobbying groups oppose key provisions and a final policy still appears to be months away, according to those involved and Defense Department records.

The lobbying groups opposing the plan say they're in favor of the idea in principle, but said they believe that implementing key portions of it overseas is unrealistic. They represent thousands of firms, including some of the industry's biggest names, such as DynCorp International and Halliburton subsidiary KBR, both of which have been linked to trafficking-related concerns.


http://www.newsdesk.org/archives/000442.php

Why would the U.S. stall this? And why does Halliburton and Dynacorp keep coming up. I've seen more but did not post all the links. There seems to be an equation between souless sex and the Bush admin./corporate friends. The cesspool is bloated and must be drained.
"Democracy is not the law of the majority, it's the protection of the minority." -Albert Camus 1913-1960

 

Return To TAT