Author Topic: Who cares that E. May is excluded from the leaders' debate?  (Read 11155 times)

RP.

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1224
    • View Profile
Re: Who cares that E. May is excluded from the leaders' debate?
« Reply #105 on: September 12, 2008, 10:24:21 PM »
Quote from: transplant
Rrriiight.

Look, I don't know what's wrong with me that I can't hear it.

transplant

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
    • View Profile
Re: Who cares that E. May is excluded from the leaders' debate?
« Reply #106 on: September 12, 2008, 11:28:00 PM »
Quote from: skdadl
Where did you find it, transplant? At the Agenda site?

Yep, and I just watched it again in the 11pm rebroadcast.

And...
Quote from: RP.
Look, I don't know what's wrong with me that I can't hear it.

Doesn't much matter any more RP, tonight May said she said "...and I fundamentally disagree with that assessment"

Now that's one I can't hear no matter how many times I listen to the clip. I don't think there is anyone who knows what the hell she said.
Hope has met reality

Toedancer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13966
    • View Profile
Re: Who cares that E. May is excluded from the leaders' debate?
« Reply #107 on: September 12, 2008, 11:50:31 PM »
Quote from: RP.
Quote from: transplant
Rrriiight.

Look, I don't know what's wrong with me that I can't hear it.

It's eeaassyy. Just listen to it with the word 'I' firmly planted in your brain and you will hear I. Then listen with 'they' firmly planted in your brain, and you will hear it. Then listen all loosey-goosey and you will hear they again. Fuck she's a meta-talker.

And anyways how does TRansplant find the real what she said she said?
"Democracy is not the law of the majority, it's the protection of the minority." -Albert Camus 1913-1960

skdadl

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32874
    • View Profile
    • http://www.pogge.ca
Re: Who cares that E. May is excluded from the leaders' debate?
« Reply #108 on: September 13, 2008, 07:49:50 AM »
You can watch at the Agenda site.

And that was one weird explanation. As someone says on ProgBlogs this a.m., she had a couple of entirely believable explanations she could have used (see transplant's reasoning early on), but instead she made up something completely new that is completely unbelievable.

What also blew my mind: the only question she answered straightforwardly was the question at the end about Afghanistan. That was a good answer -- maybe when she's on unfamiliar turf, she sticks closer to the script.

 

Return To TAT